p2p/simulations: consistent naming for test providers Node.UnmarshalJSON

This commit is contained in:
Ferenc Szabo 2019-01-31 13:13:58 +01:00
parent 83ed2baa63
commit 7d6bc331e2

View file

@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ func TestNode_UnmarshalJSON(t *testing.T) {
t.Run(
"test unmarshal of Node Config field",
func(t *testing.T) {
runNodeUnmarshalJSON(t, casesNodeUnmarshalJSONConfig())
runNodeUnmarshalJSON(t, casesNodeUnmarshalJSONConfigField())
},
)
}
@ -590,12 +590,12 @@ func casesNodeUnmarshalJSONUpField() []nodeUnmarshalTestCase {
}
}
func casesNodeUnmarshalJSONConfig() []nodeUnmarshalTestCase {
func casesNodeUnmarshalJSONConfigField() []nodeUnmarshalTestCase {
// Don't do a big fuss around testing, as adapters.NodeConfig should
// handle it's own serialization. Just do a sanity check.
return []nodeUnmarshalTestCase{
{
name: "missing Config field",
name: "Config field is omitted",
marshaled: "{}",
want: Node{
Config: nil,