ci: improve github pull request template (#2026)

This commit is contained in:
Daniel Liu 2026-02-07 02:45:01 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 0a7e7dde38
commit ec78122a31
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -1,21 +1,27 @@
# Proposed changes
Describe the big picture of your changes here to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request.
<!-- Describe the big picture of your changes here to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request. -->
## Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
_Put an `✅` in the boxes that apply_
- [ ] Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
- [ ] Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)
- [ ] Regular KTLO or any of the maintaince work. e.g code style
- [ ] CICD Improvement
- [ ] build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
- [ ] ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
- [ ] chore: Changes that don't change source code or tests
- [ ] docs: Documentation only changes
- [ ] feat: A new feature
- [ ] fix: A bug fix
- [ ] perf: A code change that improves performance
- [ ] refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
- [ ] revert: Revert something
- [ ] style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code
- [ ] test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
## Impacted Components
Which part of the codebase this PR will touch base on,
Which parts of the codebase do this PR touch?
_Put an `✅` in the boxes that apply_
- [ ] Consensus
@ -27,6 +33,7 @@ _Put an `✅` in the boxes that apply_
- [ ] Not sure (Please specify below)
## Checklist
_Put an `✅` in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that_
- [ ] This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage