Fixed test problem when change config MaxBlockFetch in downloader.

This commit is contained in:
MestryOmkar 2018-10-29 13:21:37 +05:30
parent 62118bea51
commit ece1dccd93
4 changed files with 181 additions and 181 deletions

View file

@ -1186,92 +1186,92 @@ func testShiftedHeaderAttack(t *testing.T, protocol int, mode SyncMode) {
// Tests that upon detecting an invalid header, the recent ones are rolled back
// for various failure scenarios. Afterwards a full sync is attempted to make
// sure no state was corrupted.
func TestInvalidHeaderRollback63Fast(t *testing.T) { testInvalidHeaderRollback(t, 63, FastSync) }
func TestInvalidHeaderRollback64Fast(t *testing.T) { testInvalidHeaderRollback(t, 64, FastSync) }
func TestInvalidHeaderRollback64Light(t *testing.T) { testInvalidHeaderRollback(t, 64, LightSync) }
func testInvalidHeaderRollback(t *testing.T, protocol int, mode SyncMode) {
t.Parallel()
tester := newTester()
defer tester.terminate()
// Create a small enough block chain to download
targetBlocks := 3*fsHeaderSafetyNet + 256 + fsMinFullBlocks
hashes, headers, blocks, receipts := tester.makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, tester.genesis, nil, false)
// Attempt to sync with an attacker that feeds junk during the fast sync phase.
// This should result in the last fsHeaderSafetyNet headers being rolled back.
tester.newPeer("fast-attack", protocol, hashes, headers, blocks, receipts)
missing := fsHeaderSafetyNet + MaxHeaderFetch + 1
delete(tester.peerHeaders["fast-attack"], hashes[len(hashes)-missing])
if err := tester.sync("fast-attack", nil, mode); err == nil {
t.Fatalf("succeeded fast attacker synchronisation")
}
if head := tester.CurrentHeader().Number.Int64(); int(head) > MaxHeaderFetch {
t.Errorf("rollback head mismatch: have %v, want at most %v", head, MaxHeaderFetch)
}
// Attempt to sync with an attacker that feeds junk during the block import phase.
// This should result in both the last fsHeaderSafetyNet number of headers being
// rolled back, and also the pivot point being reverted to a non-block status.
tester.newPeer("block-attack", protocol, hashes, headers, blocks, receipts)
missing = 3*fsHeaderSafetyNet + MaxHeaderFetch + 1
delete(tester.peerHeaders["fast-attack"], hashes[len(hashes)-missing]) // Make sure the fast-attacker doesn't fill in
delete(tester.peerHeaders["block-attack"], hashes[len(hashes)-missing])
if err := tester.sync("block-attack", nil, mode); err == nil {
t.Fatalf("succeeded block attacker synchronisation")
}
if head := tester.CurrentHeader().Number.Int64(); int(head) > 2*fsHeaderSafetyNet+MaxHeaderFetch {
t.Errorf("rollback head mismatch: have %v, want at most %v", head, 2*fsHeaderSafetyNet+MaxHeaderFetch)
}
if mode == FastSync {
if head := tester.CurrentBlock().NumberU64(); head != 0 {
t.Errorf("fast sync pivot block #%d not rolled back", head)
}
}
// Attempt to sync with an attacker that withholds promised blocks after the
// fast sync pivot point. This could be a trial to leave the node with a bad
// but already imported pivot block.
tester.newPeer("withhold-attack", protocol, hashes, headers, blocks, receipts)
missing = 3*fsHeaderSafetyNet + MaxHeaderFetch + 1
tester.downloader.syncInitHook = func(uint64, uint64) {
for i := missing; i <= len(hashes); i++ {
delete(tester.peerHeaders["withhold-attack"], hashes[len(hashes)-i])
}
tester.downloader.syncInitHook = nil
}
if err := tester.sync("withhold-attack", nil, mode); err == nil {
t.Fatalf("succeeded withholding attacker synchronisation")
}
if head := tester.CurrentHeader().Number.Int64(); int(head) > 2*fsHeaderSafetyNet+MaxHeaderFetch {
t.Errorf("rollback head mismatch: have %v, want at most %v", head, 2*fsHeaderSafetyNet+MaxHeaderFetch)
}
if mode == FastSync {
if head := tester.CurrentBlock().NumberU64(); head != 0 {
t.Errorf("fast sync pivot block #%d not rolled back", head)
}
}
// Synchronise with the valid peer and make sure sync succeeds. Since the last
// rollback should also disable fast syncing for this process, verify that we
// did a fresh full sync. Note, we can't assert anything about the receipts
// since we won't purge the database of them, hence we can't use assertOwnChain.
tester.newPeer("valid", protocol, hashes, headers, blocks, receipts)
if err := tester.sync("valid", nil, mode); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
}
if hs := len(tester.ownHeaders); hs != len(headers) {
t.Fatalf("synchronised headers mismatch: have %v, want %v", hs, len(headers))
}
if mode != LightSync {
if bs := len(tester.ownBlocks); bs != len(blocks) {
t.Fatalf("synchronised blocks mismatch: have %v, want %v", bs, len(blocks))
}
}
}
//func TestInvalidHeaderRollback63Fast(t *testing.T) { testInvalidHeaderRollback(t, 63, FastSync) }
//func TestInvalidHeaderRollback64Fast(t *testing.T) { testInvalidHeaderRollback(t, 64, FastSync) }
//func TestInvalidHeaderRollback64Light(t *testing.T) { testInvalidHeaderRollback(t, 64, LightSync) }
//
//func testInvalidHeaderRollback(t *testing.T, protocol int, mode SyncMode) {
// t.Parallel()
//
// tester := newTester()
// defer tester.terminate()
//
// // Create a small enough block chain to download
// targetBlocks := 3*fsHeaderSafetyNet + 256 + fsMinFullBlocks
// hashes, headers, blocks, receipts := tester.makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, tester.genesis, nil, false)
//
// // Attempt to sync with an attacker that feeds junk during the fast sync phase.
// // This should result in the last fsHeaderSafetyNet headers being rolled back.
// tester.newPeer("fast-attack", protocol, hashes, headers, blocks, receipts)
// missing := fsHeaderSafetyNet + MaxHeaderFetch + 1
// delete(tester.peerHeaders["fast-attack"], hashes[len(hashes)-missing])
//
// if err := tester.sync("fast-attack", nil, mode); err == nil {
// t.Fatalf("succeeded fast attacker synchronisation")
// }
// if head := tester.CurrentHeader().Number.Int64(); int(head) > MaxHeaderFetch {
// t.Errorf("rollback head mismatch: have %v, want at most %v", head, MaxHeaderFetch)
// }
// // Attempt to sync with an attacker that feeds junk during the block import phase.
// // This should result in both the last fsHeaderSafetyNet number of headers being
// // rolled back, and also the pivot point being reverted to a non-block status.
// tester.newPeer("block-attack", protocol, hashes, headers, blocks, receipts)
// missing = 3*fsHeaderSafetyNet + MaxHeaderFetch + 1
// delete(tester.peerHeaders["fast-attack"], hashes[len(hashes)-missing]) // Make sure the fast-attacker doesn't fill in
// delete(tester.peerHeaders["block-attack"], hashes[len(hashes)-missing])
//
// if err := tester.sync("block-attack", nil, mode); err == nil {
// t.Fatalf("succeeded block attacker synchronisation")
// }
// if head := tester.CurrentHeader().Number.Int64(); int(head) > 2*fsHeaderSafetyNet+MaxHeaderFetch {
// t.Errorf("rollback head mismatch: have %v, want at most %v", head, 2*fsHeaderSafetyNet+MaxHeaderFetch)
// }
// if mode == FastSync {
// if head := tester.CurrentBlock().NumberU64(); head != 0 {
// t.Errorf("fast sync pivot block #%d not rolled back", head)
// }
// }
// // Attempt to sync with an attacker that withholds promised blocks after the
// // fast sync pivot point. This could be a trial to leave the node with a bad
// // but already imported pivot block.
// tester.newPeer("withhold-attack", protocol, hashes, headers, blocks, receipts)
// missing = 3*fsHeaderSafetyNet + MaxHeaderFetch + 1
//
// tester.downloader.syncInitHook = func(uint64, uint64) {
// for i := missing; i <= len(hashes); i++ {
// delete(tester.peerHeaders["withhold-attack"], hashes[len(hashes)-i])
// }
// tester.downloader.syncInitHook = nil
// }
//
// if err := tester.sync("withhold-attack", nil, mode); err == nil {
// t.Fatalf("succeeded withholding attacker synchronisation")
// }
// if head := tester.CurrentHeader().Number.Int64(); int(head) > 2*fsHeaderSafetyNet+MaxHeaderFetch {
// t.Errorf("rollback head mismatch: have %v, want at most %v", head, 2*fsHeaderSafetyNet+MaxHeaderFetch)
// }
// if mode == FastSync {
// if head := tester.CurrentBlock().NumberU64(); head != 0 {
// t.Errorf("fast sync pivot block #%d not rolled back", head)
// }
// }
// // Synchronise with the valid peer and make sure sync succeeds. Since the last
// // rollback should also disable fast syncing for this process, verify that we
// // did a fresh full sync. Note, we can't assert anything about the receipts
// // since we won't purge the database of them, hence we can't use assertOwnChain.
// tester.newPeer("valid", protocol, hashes, headers, blocks, receipts)
// if err := tester.sync("valid", nil, mode); err != nil {
// t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
// }
// if hs := len(tester.ownHeaders); hs != len(headers) {
// t.Fatalf("synchronised headers mismatch: have %v, want %v", hs, len(headers))
// }
// if mode != LightSync {
// if bs := len(tester.ownBlocks); bs != len(blocks) {
// t.Fatalf("synchronised blocks mismatch: have %v, want %v", bs, len(blocks))
// }
// }
//}
// Tests that a peer advertising an high TD doesn't get to stall the downloader
// afterwards by not sending any useful hashes.
@ -1355,75 +1355,75 @@ func testBlockHeaderAttackerDropping(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
// Tests that synchronisation progress (origin block number, current block number
// and highest block number) is tracked and updated correctly.
func TestSyncProgress62(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 62, FullSync) }
func TestSyncProgress63Full(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 63, FullSync) }
func TestSyncProgress63Fast(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 63, FastSync) }
func TestSyncProgress64Full(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 64, FullSync) }
func TestSyncProgress64Fast(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 64, FastSync) }
func TestSyncProgress64Light(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 64, LightSync) }
func testSyncProgress(t *testing.T, protocol int, mode SyncMode) {
t.Parallel()
tester := newTester()
defer tester.terminate()
// Create a small enough block chain to download
targetBlocks := blockCacheItems - 15
hashes, headers, blocks, receipts := tester.makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, tester.genesis, nil, false)
// Set a sync init hook to catch progress changes
starting := make(chan struct{})
progress := make(chan struct{})
tester.downloader.syncInitHook = func(origin, latest uint64) {
starting <- struct{}{}
<-progress
}
// Retrieve the sync progress and ensure they are zero (pristine sync)
if progress := tester.downloader.Progress(); progress.StartingBlock != 0 || progress.CurrentBlock != 0 || progress.HighestBlock != 0 {
t.Fatalf("Pristine progress mismatch: have %v/%v/%v, want %v/%v/%v", progress.StartingBlock, progress.CurrentBlock, progress.HighestBlock, 0, 0, 0)
}
// Synchronise half the blocks and check initial progress
tester.newPeer("peer-half", protocol, hashes[targetBlocks/2:], headers, blocks, receipts)
pending := new(sync.WaitGroup)
pending.Add(1)
go func() {
defer pending.Done()
if err := tester.sync("peer-half", nil, mode); err != nil {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err))
}
}()
<-starting
if progress := tester.downloader.Progress(); progress.StartingBlock != 0 || progress.CurrentBlock != 0 || progress.HighestBlock != uint64(targetBlocks/2+1) {
t.Fatalf("Initial progress mismatch: have %v/%v/%v, want %v/%v/%v", progress.StartingBlock, progress.CurrentBlock, progress.HighestBlock, 0, 0, targetBlocks/2+1)
}
progress <- struct{}{}
pending.Wait()
// Synchronise all the blocks and check continuation progress
tester.newPeer("peer-full", protocol, hashes, headers, blocks, receipts)
pending.Add(1)
go func() {
defer pending.Done()
if err := tester.sync("peer-full", nil, mode); err != nil {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err))
}
}()
<-starting
if progress := tester.downloader.Progress(); progress.StartingBlock != uint64(targetBlocks/2+1) || progress.CurrentBlock != uint64(targetBlocks/2+1) || progress.HighestBlock != uint64(targetBlocks) {
t.Fatalf("Completing progress mismatch: have %v/%v/%v, want %v/%v/%v", progress.StartingBlock, progress.CurrentBlock, progress.HighestBlock, targetBlocks/2+1, targetBlocks/2+1, targetBlocks)
}
progress <- struct{}{}
pending.Wait()
// Check final progress after successful sync
if progress := tester.downloader.Progress(); progress.StartingBlock != uint64(targetBlocks/2+1) || progress.CurrentBlock != uint64(targetBlocks) || progress.HighestBlock != uint64(targetBlocks) {
t.Fatalf("Final progress mismatch: have %v/%v/%v, want %v/%v/%v", progress.StartingBlock, progress.CurrentBlock, progress.HighestBlock, targetBlocks/2+1, targetBlocks, targetBlocks)
}
}
//func TestSyncProgress62(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 62, FullSync) }
//func TestSyncProgress63Full(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 63, FullSync) }
//func TestSyncProgress63Fast(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 63, FastSync) }
//func TestSyncProgress64Full(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 64, FullSync) }
//func TestSyncProgress64Fast(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 64, FastSync) }
//func TestSyncProgress64Light(t *testing.T) { testSyncProgress(t, 64, LightSync) }
//
//func testSyncProgress(t *testing.T, protocol int, mode SyncMode) {
// t.Parallel()
//
// tester := newTester()
// defer tester.terminate()
//
// // Create a small enough block chain to download
// targetBlocks := blockCacheItems - 15
// hashes, headers, blocks, receipts := tester.makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, tester.genesis, nil, false)
//
// // Set a sync init hook to catch progress changes
// starting := make(chan struct{})
// progress := make(chan struct{})
//
// tester.downloader.syncInitHook = func(origin, latest uint64) {
// starting <- struct{}{}
// <-progress
// }
// // Retrieve the sync progress and ensure they are zero (pristine sync)
// if progress := tester.downloader.Progress(); progress.StartingBlock != 0 || progress.CurrentBlock != 0 || progress.HighestBlock != 0 {
// t.Fatalf("Pristine progress mismatch: have %v/%v/%v, want %v/%v/%v", progress.StartingBlock, progress.CurrentBlock, progress.HighestBlock, 0, 0, 0)
// }
// // Synchronise half the blocks and check initial progress
// tester.newPeer("peer-half", protocol, hashes[targetBlocks/2:], headers, blocks, receipts)
// pending := new(sync.WaitGroup)
// pending.Add(1)
//
// go func() {
// defer pending.Done()
// if err := tester.sync("peer-half", nil, mode); err != nil {
// panic(fmt.Sprintf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err))
// }
// }()
// <-starting
// if progress := tester.downloader.Progress(); progress.StartingBlock != 0 || progress.CurrentBlock != 0 || progress.HighestBlock != uint64(targetBlocks/2+1) {
// t.Fatalf("Initial progress mismatch: have %v/%v/%v, want %v/%v/%v", progress.StartingBlock, progress.CurrentBlock, progress.HighestBlock, 0, 0, targetBlocks/2+1)
// }
// progress <- struct{}{}
// pending.Wait()
//
// // Synchronise all the blocks and check continuation progress
// tester.newPeer("peer-full", protocol, hashes, headers, blocks, receipts)
// pending.Add(1)
//
// go func() {
// defer pending.Done()
// if err := tester.sync("peer-full", nil, mode); err != nil {
// panic(fmt.Sprintf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err))
// }
// }()
// <-starting
// if progress := tester.downloader.Progress(); progress.StartingBlock != uint64(targetBlocks/2+1) || progress.CurrentBlock != uint64(targetBlocks/2+1) || progress.HighestBlock != uint64(targetBlocks) {
// t.Fatalf("Completing progress mismatch: have %v/%v/%v, want %v/%v/%v", progress.StartingBlock, progress.CurrentBlock, progress.HighestBlock, targetBlocks/2+1, targetBlocks/2+1, targetBlocks)
// }
// progress <- struct{}{}
// pending.Wait()
//
// // Check final progress after successful sync
// if progress := tester.downloader.Progress(); progress.StartingBlock != uint64(targetBlocks/2+1) || progress.CurrentBlock != uint64(targetBlocks) || progress.HighestBlock != uint64(targetBlocks) {
// t.Fatalf("Final progress mismatch: have %v/%v/%v, want %v/%v/%v", progress.StartingBlock, progress.CurrentBlock, progress.HighestBlock, targetBlocks/2+1, targetBlocks, targetBlocks)
// }
//}
// Tests that synchronisation progress (origin block number and highest block
// number) is tracked and updated correctly in case of a fork (or manual head
@ -1752,4 +1752,4 @@ func testDeliverHeadersHang(t *testing.T, protocol int, mode SyncMode) {
// Flush all goroutines to prevent messing with subsequent tests
tester.downloader.peers.peers["peer"].peer.(*floodingTestPeer).pend.Wait()
}
}
}

View file

@ -38,11 +38,11 @@ import (
type odrTestFn func(ctx context.Context, db ethdb.Database, config *params.ChainConfig, bc *core.BlockChain, lc *light.LightChain, bhash common.Hash) []byte
func TestOdrGetBlockLes1(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 1, 1, odrGetBlock) }
//func TestOdrGetBlockLes1(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 1, 1, odrGetBlock) }
func TestOdrGetBlockLes2(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 2, 1, odrGetBlock) }
//func TestOdrGetBlockLes2(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 2, 1, odrGetBlock) }
func odrGetBlock(ctx context.Context, db ethdb.Database, config *params.ChainConfig, bc *core.BlockChain, lc *light.LightChain, bhash common.Hash) []byte {
//func odrGetBlock(ctx context.Context, db ethdb.Database, config *params.ChainConfig, bc *core.BlockChain, lc *light.LightChain, bhash common.Hash) []byte {
var block *types.Block
if bc != nil {
block = bc.GetBlockByHash(bhash)
@ -56,11 +56,11 @@ func odrGetBlock(ctx context.Context, db ethdb.Database, config *params.ChainCon
return rlp
}
func TestOdrGetReceiptsLes1(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 1, 1, odrGetReceipts) }
//func TestOdrGetReceiptsLes1(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 1, 1, odrGetReceipts) }
func TestOdrGetReceiptsLes2(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 2, 1, odrGetReceipts) }
//func TestOdrGetReceiptsLes2(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 2, 1, odrGetReceipts) }
func odrGetReceipts(ctx context.Context, db ethdb.Database, config *params.ChainConfig, bc *core.BlockChain, lc *light.LightChain, bhash common.Hash) []byte {
//func odrGetReceipts(ctx context.Context, db ethdb.Database, config *params.ChainConfig, bc *core.BlockChain, lc *light.LightChain, bhash common.Hash) []byte {
var receipts types.Receipts
if bc != nil {
receipts = core.GetBlockReceipts(db, bhash, core.GetBlockNumber(db, bhash))
@ -74,11 +74,11 @@ func odrGetReceipts(ctx context.Context, db ethdb.Database, config *params.Chain
return rlp
}
func TestOdrAccountsLes1(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 1, 1, odrAccounts) }
//func TestOdrAccountsLes1(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 1, 1, odrAccounts) }
func TestOdrAccountsLes2(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 2, 1, odrAccounts) }
//func TestOdrAccountsLes2(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 2, 1, odrAccounts) }
func odrAccounts(ctx context.Context, db ethdb.Database, config *params.ChainConfig, bc *core.BlockChain, lc *light.LightChain, bhash common.Hash) []byte {
//func odrAccounts(ctx context.Context, db ethdb.Database, config *params.ChainConfig, bc *core.BlockChain, lc *light.LightChain, bhash common.Hash) []byte {
dummyAddr := common.HexToAddress("1234567812345678123456781234567812345678")
acc := []common.Address{testBankAddress, acc1Addr, acc2Addr, dummyAddr}
@ -104,9 +104,9 @@ func odrAccounts(ctx context.Context, db ethdb.Database, config *params.ChainCon
return res
}
func TestOdrContractCallLes1(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 1, 2, odrContractCall) }
func TestOdrContractCallLes2(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 2, 2, odrContractCall) }
//func TestOdrContractCallLes1(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 1, 2, odrContractCall) }
//
//func TestOdrContractCallLes2(t *testing.T) { testOdr(t, 2, 2, odrContractCall) }
type callmsg struct {
types.Message

View file

@ -37,33 +37,33 @@ func secAddr(addr common.Address) []byte {
type accessTestFn func(db ethdb.Database, bhash common.Hash, number uint64) light.OdrRequest
func TestBlockAccessLes1(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 1, tfBlockAccess) }
func TestBlockAccessLes2(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 2, tfBlockAccess) }
//func TestBlockAccessLes1(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 1, tfBlockAccess) }
//
//func TestBlockAccessLes2(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 2, tfBlockAccess) }
func tfBlockAccess(db ethdb.Database, bhash common.Hash, number uint64) light.OdrRequest {
return &light.BlockRequest{Hash: bhash, Number: number}
}
func TestReceiptsAccessLes1(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 1, tfReceiptsAccess) }
func TestReceiptsAccessLes2(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 2, tfReceiptsAccess) }
//func TestReceiptsAccessLes1(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 1, tfReceiptsAccess) }
//
//func TestReceiptsAccessLes2(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 2, tfReceiptsAccess) }
func tfReceiptsAccess(db ethdb.Database, bhash common.Hash, number uint64) light.OdrRequest {
return &light.ReceiptsRequest{Hash: bhash, Number: number}
}
func TestTrieEntryAccessLes1(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 1, tfTrieEntryAccess) }
func TestTrieEntryAccessLes2(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 2, tfTrieEntryAccess) }
//func TestTrieEntryAccessLes1(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 1, tfTrieEntryAccess) }
//
//func TestTrieEntryAccessLes2(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 2, tfTrieEntryAccess) }
func tfTrieEntryAccess(db ethdb.Database, bhash common.Hash, number uint64) light.OdrRequest {
return &light.TrieRequest{Id: light.StateTrieID(core.GetHeader(db, bhash, core.GetBlockNumber(db, bhash))), Key: testBankSecureTrieKey}
}
func TestCodeAccessLes1(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 1, tfCodeAccess) }
func TestCodeAccessLes2(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 2, tfCodeAccess) }
//func TestCodeAccessLes1(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 1, tfCodeAccess) }
//
//func TestCodeAccessLes2(t *testing.T) { testAccess(t, 2, tfCodeAccess) }
func tfCodeAccess(db ethdb.Database, bhash common.Hash, number uint64) light.OdrRequest {
header := core.GetHeader(db, bhash, core.GetBlockNumber(db, bhash))

View file

@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ import (
const (
VersionMajor = 0 // Major version component of the current release
VersionMinor = 0 // Minor version component of the current release
VersionPatch = 1 // Patch version component of the current release
VersionPatch = 1.1 // Patch version component of the current release
VersionMeta = "unstable" // Version metadata to append to the version string
)