* add support for three access list execution mode presets exposed via the --bal.executionmode flag:
- sequential: no performance acceleration
- full: parallel transaction execution, state root calculation, async warming of access list reads
- nobatchio: same as 'full', but without async warming of access list reads
* fix the way metrics are reported when executing access-list-containing blocks to be in-line with how it's done for other blocks.
* fix blockchain tests runner
while trying to re-run 7843 tests again i saw geth panic (no clean hive
errors btw) and this fixes it. i think `parallelProcessor` field in
`BlockChain` was never initialized, so if u get a block with bal u run
`processBlockWithAccessList()` which then calls
`bc.parallelProcessor.Process(...)` which eventually calls
`p.chainConfig()` which then tries `p.chain.Config()` but `p.chain` is
still `nil`, ripbozo. i applied this fix and now geth again passes all
7843 tests. you also pass 179/184 tests of eip-8024, but those 5 failing
could be on our side and have nothing to do with this pr
had to make these changes to successfully test eip-7843 via `consume
engine`. could be useful to u.
edit: maybe the type change from `uint64` can be removed, i can fix that
on our end
This PR extends the statistics of contract code read by adding these
fields:
- **CacheHitBytes**: the total number of bytes served by cache
- **CacheMissBytes**: the total number of bytes read on cache miss
- **CodeReadBytes**: the total number of bytes for contract code read
Calling `pool.priced.Removed` is needed to keep is sync with
`pool.all.Remove`.
It was called in other occurances, but not here.
The counter is used for internal heap management. It was working even without this, just not calling reheap at the intended frequency.
Signed-off-by: Csaba Kiraly <csaba.kiraly@gmail.com>
This PR adds metrics that count the number of accounts having transactions
in the txpool. Together with the transaction count this can be used as a
simple indicator of the diversity of transactions in the pool.
Note: as an alternative implementation, we could use a periodic or event
driven update of these Gauges using len.
I've preferred this implementation to match what we have for the pool
sizes.
---------
Signed-off-by: Csaba Kiraly <csaba.kiraly@gmail.com>
Fixes#33630
Sort self-destructed addresses before emitting hooks in Finalise() to
ensure deterministic ordering and fix flaky test
TestHooks_OnCodeChangeV2.
---------
Co-authored-by: jwasinger <j-wasinger@hotmail.com>
This PR reverts a part of changes brought by https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/33281/changes
Specifically, read-only protection should always be enforced at the opcode level,
regardless of whether the check has already been performed during gas metering.
It should act as a gatekeeper, otherwise, it is easy to introduce errors by adding
new gas measurement logic without consistently applying the read-only protection.
The core part of this PR that we need to adopt is to move the code and
nonce change hook invocations to occur at tx finalization, instead of
when the selfdestruct opcode is called.
Additionally:
* remove `SelfDestruct6780` now that it is essentially the same as
`SelfDestruct` just gated by `is new contract`
* don't duplicate `BalanceIncreaseSelfdestruct` (transfer to recipient
of selfdestruct) in the hooked statedb and in the opcode handler for the
selfdestruct opcode.
* balance is burned immediately when the beneficiary of the selfdestruct
is the sender, and the contract was created in the same transaction.
Previously we emit two balance increases to the recipient (see above
point), and a balance decrease from the sender.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sina Mahmoodi <itz.s1na@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: lightclient <lightclient@protonmail.com>
There's no need to perform the subsequent state access on the target if
we already know that we are out of gas.
This aligns the state access behavior of selfdestruct with EIP-7928
This PR causes execution to terminate at the gas handler in the case of
sstore/call if they are invoked in a static execution context.
This aligns the behavior with EIP 7928 by ensuring that we don't record
any state reads in the access list from an SSTORE/CALL in this
circumstance.
---------
Co-authored-by: lightclient <lightclient@protonmail.com>
This PR fixes an issue where the tx indexer would repeatedly try to
“unindex” a block with a missing body, causing a spike in CPU usage.
This change skips these blocks and advances the index tail. The fix was
verified both manually on a local development chain and with a new test.
resolves#33371
Allow the blobpool to accept blobs out of nonce order
Previously, we were dropping blobs that arrived out-of-order. However,
since fetch decisions are done on receiver side,
out-of-order delivery can happen, leading to inefficiencies.
This PR:
- adds an in-memory blob tx storage, similar to the queue in the
legacypool
- a limited number of received txs can be added to this per account
- txs waiting in the gapped queue are not processed further and not
propagated further until they are unblocked by adding the previos nonce
to the blobpool
The size of the in-memory storage is currently limited per account,
following a slow-start logic.
An overall size limit, and a TTL is also enforced for DoS protection.
---------
Signed-off-by: Csaba Kiraly <csaba.kiraly@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MariusVanDerWijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
### Description
Add a new `OnStateUpdate` hook which gets invoked after state is
committed.
### Rationale
For our particular use case, we need to obtain the state size metrics at
every single block when fuly syncing from genesis. With the current
state sizer, whenever the node is stopped, the background process must
be freshly initialized. During this re-initialization, it can skip some
blocks while the node continues executing blocks, causing gaps in the
recorded metrics.
Using this state update hook allows us to customize our own data
persistence logic, and we would never skip blocks upon node restart.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
