Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
CPerezz
0835ce4bb5
trie/bintrie: tighten DeleteAccount docs and helpers
Follow-ups from PR review, bundled together because they are all
non-functional documentation and helper polish:

- Move accountDeletedMarkerKey to key_encoding.go alongside the
  other leaf-key constants, and drop the stale "Keep this in sync"
  directive. After this PR both GetAccount and DeleteAccount
  reference the constant by name, so there is nothing left to
  manually keep in sync.

- Replace the hard-coded "trie.go:219" line references in the
  DeleteAccount doc and body comments with function-name references
  ("GetAccount's deletion-detection branch"). Line references rot
  on any edit above the target line.

- Clarify what protects header storage from DeleteAccount: it shares
  the same stem as BasicData/CodeHash, so the safety comes from
  non-colliding offsets plus the nil-means-"do not overwrite"
  semantics of StemNode.InsertValuesAtStem, not from living at a
  different stem. Mirror the clarification in the
  TestDeleteAccountDoesNotAffectMainStorage comment and
  cross-reference the header-storage test.

- Rename newTestTrie to newEmptyTestTrie so readers can pick between
  "empty" (this helper) and "pre-populated with entries" (makeTrie
  in iterator_test.go) without guessing.
2026-04-08 12:50:00 +02:00
Guillaume Ballet
1c9ddee16f
trie/bintrie: use a sync.Pool when hashing binary tree nodes (#33989)
Some checks are pending
/ Linux Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Linux Build (arm) (push) Waiting to run
/ Keeper Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Windows Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Docker Image (push) Waiting to run
Binary tree hashing is quite slow, owing to many factors. One of them is
the GC pressure that is the consequence of allocating many hashers, as a
binary tree has 4x the size of an MPT. This PR introduces an
optimization that already exists for the MPT: keep a pool of hashers, in
order to reduce the amount of allocations.
2026-03-12 10:20:12 +01:00
Guillaume Ballet
a0fb8102fe
trie/bintrie: fix overflow management in slot key computation (#33951)
Some checks are pending
/ Linux Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Linux Build (arm) (push) Waiting to run
/ Keeper Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Docker Image (push) Waiting to run
/ Windows Build (push) Waiting to run
The computation of `MAIN_STORAGE_OFFSET` was incorrect, causing the last
byte of the stem to be dropped. This means that there would be a
collision in the hash computation (at the preimage level, not a hash
collision of course) if two keys were only differing at byte 31.
2026-03-05 14:43:31 +01:00
Ng Wei Han
3d05284928
trie/bintrie: fix tree key hashing to match spec (#33694)
Based on [EIP-7864](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7864), the tree
index should be 32 bytes instead of 31 bytes.
```
def get_tree_key(address: Address32, tree_index: int, sub_index: int):
    # Assumes STEM_SUBTREE_WIDTH = 256
    return tree_hash(address + tree_index.to_bytes(32, "little"))[:31] + bytes(
        [sub_index]
    )
```
2026-01-28 11:51:02 +01:00
Guillaume Ballet
3f641dba87
trie, go.mod: remove all references to go-verkle and go-ipa (#33461)
In order to reduce the amount of code that is embedded into the keeper
binary, I am removing all the verkle code that uses go-verkle and
go-ipa. This will be followed by further PRs that are more like stubs to
replace code when the keeper build is detected.

I'm keeping the binary tree of course. This means that you will still
see `isVerkle` variables all over the codebase, but they will be renamed
when code is touched (i.e. this is not an invitation for 30+ AI slop
PRs).

---------

Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
2025-12-30 20:44:04 +08:00
Guillaume Ballet
2a2f106a01
cmd/evm/internal/t8ntool, trie: support for verkle-at-genesis, use UBT, and move the transition tree to its own package (#32445)
Some checks are pending
/ Linux Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Linux Build (arm) (push) Waiting to run
/ Keeper Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Windows Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Docker Image (push) Waiting to run
This is broken off of #31730 to only focus on testing networks that
start with verkle at genesis.

The PR has seen a lot of work since its creation, and it now targets
creating and re-executing tests for a binary tree testnet without the
transition (so it starts at genesis). The transition tree has been moved
to its own package. It also replaces verkle with the binary tree for
this specific application.

---------

Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
2025-11-14 15:25:30 +01:00
Guillaume Ballet
bd4b17907f
trie/bintrie: add eip7864 binary trees and run its tests (#32365)
Implement the binary tree as specified in [eip-7864](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7864). 

This will gradually replace verkle trees in the codebase. This is only 
running the tests and will not be executed in production, but will help 
me rebase some of my work, so that it doesn't bitrot as much.

---------

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ballet
Co-authored-by: Parithosh Jayanthi <parithosh.jayanthi@ethereum.org>
Co-authored-by: rjl493456442 <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
2025-09-01 21:06:51 +08:00