Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Guillaume Ballet
13f4362636
review from Bo-chan + Feli-chan 2026-05-01 11:52:06 +02:00
Guillaume Ballet
92a9aaf542 review feedback: simplify comment 2026-04-24 17:41:18 +02:00
Guillaume Ballet
690c16fb5c
fix some tests 2026-04-23 08:04:32 +02:00
Guillaume Ballet
1a41b73fa7
also fix serialization
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
2026-04-22 22:35:06 +02:00
Guillaume Ballet
d72ecb31d6
bring in deserialization, which was left out
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
2026-04-22 22:14:24 +02:00
Guillaume Ballet
6e35fb3b27
fix one panic in tests 2026-04-22 17:47:16 +02:00
Guillaume Ballet
9b9143b14b
more rebase fixes 2026-04-22 17:07:56 +02:00
Guillaume Ballet
26230d037f
fixes
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
2026-04-22 17:02:18 +02:00
Guillaume Ballet
c374e74ee1
trie/bintrie: print todot path in binary (#34777)
Some checks are pending
/ Linux Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Linux Build (arm) (push) Waiting to run
/ Keeper Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Windows Build (push) Waiting to run
/ Docker Image (push) Waiting to run
The nodes were named using the byte representation of the path, instead
of the binary representation. This was confusing to other client devs
trying to achieve interop.
2026-04-21 14:50:09 +02:00
CPerezz
b6d415c88d
trie/bintrie: replace BinaryNode interface with GC-free NodeRef arena (#34055)
## Summary

Replace the `BinaryNode` interface with `NodeRef uint32` indices into
typed arena pools, eliminating GC-scanned pointers from binary trie
nodes.

Inspired by [fjl's
observation](https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/34034#issuecomment-4075176446):
> *"if the binary trie produces such a large graph, it should probably
be changed so that the trie node type does not contain pointers. The
runtime does not scan objects that do not contain pointers, so it can
really help with the performance to build it this way."*

### The problem

CPU profiling of the binary trie (EIP-7864) showed **44% of CPU time in
garbage collection**. Each `InternalNode` held two `BinaryNode`
interface values (2 pointer-words each), and the GC scanned every one.
With ~25K `InternalNode`s in memory during block processing, this
created enormous GC pressure.

### The solution

`NodeRef` is a compact `uint32` (2-bit kind tag + 30-bit pool index).
`NodeStore` manages chunked typed pools per node kind:
- **InternalNode pool**: ZERO Go pointers (children are `NodeRef`, hash
is `[32]byte`) → noscan spans
- **HashedNode pool**: ZERO Go pointers → noscan spans
- **StemNode pool**: retains `Values [][]byte` (matching existing
format)

The serialization format is unchanged — flat InternalNode
`[type][leftHash][rightHash]` = 65 bytes.

## Benchmark: Apple M4 Pro (`--benchtime=10s --count=3`, on top of
#34021)

| Metric | Baseline | Arena | Delta |
|--------|----------|-------|-------|
| Approve (Mgas/s) | 374 | 382 | **+2.1%** |
| BalanceOf (Mgas/s) | 885 | 901 | **+1.8%** |
| Approve allocs/op | 775K | **607K** | **-21.7%** |
| BalanceOf allocs/op | 265K | **228K** | **-14.0%** |

## Benchmark: AMD EPYC 48-core (50GB state, execution-specs ERC-20, on
top of #34021 + #34032)

| Benchmark | Baseline | Arena | Delta |
|-----------|----------|-------|-------|
| erc20_approve (write) | 22.4 Mgas/s | **27.0 Mgas/s** | **+20.5%** |
| mixed_sload_sstore | 62.9 Mgas/s | **97.3 Mgas/s** | **+54.7%** |
| erc20_balanceof (read) | 180.8 Mgas/s | 167.6 Mgas/s | -7.3% (cold
cache variance) |

The arena benefit scales with heap size — the EPYC (larger heap, more GC
pressure) shows much larger gains than the M4 Pro (efficient unified
memory). The mixed workload baseline was unstable (62.9 vs 16.3 Mgas/s
between runs due to GC-induced throughput collapse); the arena
eliminates this entirely (95-97 Mgas/s, stable).

## Dependencies

Benchmarked with #34021 (H01 N+1 fix) + #34032 (R14 parallel hashing).
No code dependency — applies independently to master.

All test suites pass (`trie/bintrie` with `-race`, `core/state`,
`triedb/pathdb`, `cmd/geth`).

---------

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Ballet <3272758+gballet@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-20 14:08:30 +02:00