~Will probably be mostly supplanted by #32224, but this should do for
now for devnet 3.~
Seems like #32224 is going to take some more time, so I have completed
the implementation of eth_config here. It is quite a bit simpler to
implement now that the config hashing was removed.
---------
Co-authored-by: MariusVanDerWijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Ballet <3272758+gballet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: rjl493456442 <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
This PR builds on #29040 and updates it to the new version of the spec.
I filled the EEST tests and they pass.
Link to spec: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7623
---------
Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
Co-authored-by: lightclient <14004106+lightclient@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: lightclient <lightclient@protonmail.com>
This is a redo of #29052 based on newer specs. Here we implement EIPs
scheduled for the Prague fork:
- EIP-7002: Execution layer triggerable withdrawals
- EIP-7251: Increase the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE
Co-authored-by: lightclient <lightclient@protonmail.com>
EIP-4844 adds a new transaction type for blobs. Users can submit such transactions via `eth_sendRawTransaction`. In this PR we refrain from adding support to `eth_sendTransaction` and in fact it will fail if the user passes in a blob hash.
However since the chain can handle such transactions it makes sense to allow simulating them. E.g. an L2 operator should be able to simulate submitting a rollup blob and updating the L2 state. Most methods that take in a transaction object should recognize blobs. The change boils down to adding `blobVersionedHashes` and `maxFeePerBlobGas` to `TransactionArgs`. In summary:
- `eth_sendTransaction`: will fail for blob txes
- `eth_signTransaction`: will fail for blob txes
The methods that sign txes does not, as of this PR, add support the for new EIP-4844 transaction types. Resuming the summary:
- `eth_sendRawTransaction`: can send blob txes
- `eth_fillTransaction`: will fill in a blob tx. Note: here we simply fill in normal transaction fields + possibly `maxFeePerBlobGas` when blobs are present. One can imagine a more elaborate set-up where users can submit blobs themselves and we fill in proofs and commitments and such. Left for future PRs if desired.
- `eth_call`: can simulate blob messages
- `eth_estimateGas`: blobs have no effect here. They have a separate unit of gas which is not tunable in the transaction.
