This PR is the first step in the trienode history series.
It introduces the `nodeWithOrigin` struct in the path database, which tracks
the original values of dirty nodes to support trienode history construction.
Note, the original value is always empty in this PR, so it won't break the
existing journal for encoding and decoding. The compatibility of journal
should be handled in the following PR.
Introduce file-based state journal in path database, fixing
the Pebble restriction when the journal size exceeds 4GB.
---------
Signed-off-by: jsvisa <delweng@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
Previously, PathDB used a single buffer to aggregate database writes,
which needed to be flushed atomically. However, flushing large amounts
of data (e.g., 256MB) caused significant overhead, often blocking the
system for around 3 seconds during the flush.
To mitigate this overhead and reduce performance spikes, a double-buffer
mechanism is introduced. When the active buffer fills up, it is marked
as frozen and a background flushing process is triggered. Meanwhile, a
new buffer is allocated for incoming writes, allowing operations to
continue uninterrupted.
This approach reduces system blocking times and provides flexibility in
adjusting buffer parameters for improved performance.
In this pull request, snapshot generation in pathdb has been ported from
the legacy state snapshot implementation. Additionally, when running in
path mode, legacy state snapshot data is now managed by the pathdb
based snapshot logic.
Note: Existing snapshot data will be re-generated, regardless of whether
it was previously fully constructed.
This pull request delivers the new version of the state history, where
the raw storage key is used instead of the hash.
Before the cancun fork, it's supported by protocol to destruct a
specific account and therefore, all the storage slot owned by it should
be wiped in the same transition.
Technically, storage wiping should be performed through storage
iteration, and only the storage key hash will be available for traversal
if the state snapshot is not available. Therefore, the storage key hash
is chosen as the identifier in the old version state history.
Fortunately, account self-destruction has been deprecated by the
protocol since the Cancun fork, and there are no empty accounts eligible
for deletion under EIP-158. Therefore, we can conclude that no storage
wiping should occur after the Cancun fork. In this case, it makes no
sense to keep using hash.
Besides, another big reason for making this change is the current format
state history is unusable if verkle is activated. Verkle tree has a
different key derivation scheme (merkle uses keccak256), the preimage of
key hash must be provided in order to make verkle rollback functional.
This pull request is a prerequisite for landing verkle.
Additionally, the raw storage key is more human-friendly for those who
want to manually check the history, even though Solidity already
performs some hashing to derive the storage location.
---
This pull request doesn't bump the database version, as I believe the
database should still be compatible if users degrade from the new geth
version to old one, the only side effect is the persistent new version
state history will be unusable.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zsolt Felfoldi <zsfelfoldi@gmail.com>
As the node hash scheme in verkle and merkle are totally different, the
original default node hasher in pathdb is no longer suitable. Therefore,
this pull request configures different node hasher respectively.
This pull request ports some changes from the main state snapshot
integration one, specifically introducing the flat state tracking in
pathdb.
Note, the tracked flat state changes are only held in memory and won't
be persisted in the disk. Meanwhile, the correspoding state retrieval in
persistent state is also not supported yet. The states management in
disk is more complicated and will be implemented in a separate pull
request.
Part 1: https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/30752
As SELF-DESTRUCT opcode is disabled in the cancun fork(unless the
account is created within the same transaction, nothing to delete
in this case). The account will only be deleted in the following
cases:
- The account is created within the same transaction. In this case
the original storage was empty.
- The account is empty(zero nonce, zero balance, zero code) and
is touched within the transaction. Fortunately this kind of accounts
are not-existent on ethereum-mainnet.
All in all, after cancun, we are pretty sure there is no large contract
deletion and we don't need this mechanism for oom protection.
