#29995 has been reverted due to an unexpected flaw in the state snapshot
process.
Specifically, it attempts to stop the state snapshot generation, which
could potentially
cause the system to halt if the generation is not currently running.
This pull request ports the changes made in #29995 and fixes the flaw.
This PR fixes an issue with blob transaction propagation due to the blob
transation txpool rejecting transactions with gapped nonces. The
specific changes are:
- fetch transactions from a peer in the order they were announced to
minimize nonce-gaps (which cause blob txs to be rejected
- don't wait on fetching blob transactions after announcement is
received, since they are not broadcast
Testing:
- unit tests updated to reflect that fetch order should always match tx
announcement order
- unit test added to confirm blob transactions are scheduled immediately
for fetching
- running the PR on an eth mainnet full node without incident so far
---------
Signed-off-by: Roberto Bayardo <bayardo@alum.mit.edu>
Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
This is a successor PR to #25743. This PR is based on a new iteration of
the spec: https://github.com/ethereum/execution-apis/pull/484.
`eth_multicall` takes in a list of blocks, each optionally overriding
fields like number, timestamp, etc. of a base block. Each block can
include calls. At each block users can override the state. There are
extra features, such as:
- Include ether transfers as part of the logs
- Overriding precompile codes with evm bytecode
- Redirecting accounts to another address
## Breaking changes
This PR includes the following breaking changes:
- Block override fields of eth_call and debug_traceCall have had the
following fields renamed
- `coinbase` -> `feeRecipient`
- `random` -> `prevRandao`
- `baseFee` -> `baseFeePerGas`
---------
Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
This pull request replaces the field pointer in journal entry with the
field itself, specifically the address of mutated account.
While it will introduce the extra allocation cost, but it's easier for
code reading. Let's measure the overhead overall to see if the change is
acceptable or not.
This pull request introduces a state.Reader interface for state
accessing.
The interface could be implemented in various ways. It can be pure trie
only reader, or the combination of trie and state snapshot. What's more,
this interface allows us to have more flexibility in the future, e.g.
the
archive reader (for accessing archive state).
Additionally, this pull request removes the following metrics
- `chain/snapshot/account/reads`
- `chain/snapshot/storage/reads`
This PR fixes a flaky jwt-test.
The test is a jwt "from one second in the future". The test passes; the
reason for this is that the CI-system is slow, and by the time the jwt
is actually evaluated, that second has passed, and it's no longer
future.
Alternative to #30380
This PR changes how sidechains are handled.
Before the merge, it was possible to import a chain with lower td and not set it as canonical. After the merge, we expect every chain that we get via InsertChain to be canonical. Non-canonical blocks can still be inserted
with InsertBlockWIthoutSetHead.
If during the InsertChain, the existing chain is not canonical anymore, we mark it as a sidechain and send the SideChainEvents normally.
This pull request fixes a flaw in prefetcher.
In verkle tree world, both accounts and storage slots are committed into
a single tree instance for state hashing. If the prefetcher is activated, we will
try to pull the trie for the prefetcher for performance speedup.
However, we had a special logic to skip pulling storage trie if the
storage root is empty. While it's true for merkle as we have nothing to
do with an empty storage trie, it's totally wrong for verkle. The consequences
for skipping pulling is the storage changes are committed into trie A, while the
account changes are committed into trie B (pulled from the prefetcher), boom.
This PR implements changes related to
[EIP-6800](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6800) and
[EIP-4762](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4762) spec updates.
A TL;DR of the changes is that `Version`, `Balance`, `Nonce` and
`CodeSize` are encoded in a single leaf named `BasicData`. For more
details, see the [_Header Values_ table in
EIP-6800](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6800#header-values).
The motivation for this was simplifying access event patterns, reducing
code complexity, and, as a side effect, saving gas since fewer leaf
nodes must be accessed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Ballet <3272758+gballet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
This PR adds the bulk verkle witness+proof production at the end of block
production. It reads all data from the tree in one swoop and produces
a verkle proof.
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
When attempting to hash a typed data struct that includes a type
reference with a fixed-size array, the validation process fails.
According to EIP-712, arrays can be either fixed-size or dynamic,
denoted by `Type[n]` or `Type[]` respectively, although it appears this
currently isn't supported.
This change modifies the validation logic to accommodate types
containing fixed-size arrays.
This is a follow-up to #29520, and a preparatory PR to a more thorough
change in the journalling system.
### API methods instead of `append` operations
This PR hides the journal-implementation details away, so that the
statedb invokes methods like `JournalCreate`, instead of explicitly
appending journal-events in a list. This means that it's up to the
journal whether to implement it as a sequence of events or
aggregate/merge events.
### Snapshot-management inside the journal
This PR also makes it so that management of valid snapshots is moved
inside the journal, exposed via the methods `Snapshot() int` and
`RevertToSnapshot(revid int, s *StateDB)`.
### SetCode
JournalSetCode journals the setting of code: it is implicit that the
previous values were "no code" and emptyCodeHash. Therefore, we can
simplify the setCode journal.
### Selfdestruct
The self-destruct journalling is a bit strange: we allow the
selfdestruct operation to be journalled several times. This makes it so
that we also are forced to store whether the account was already
destructed.
What we can do instead, is to only journal the first destruction, and
after that only journal balance-changes, but not journal the
selfdestruct itself.
This simplifies the journalling, so that internals about state
management does not leak into the journal-API.
### Preimages
Preimages were, for some reason, integrated into the journal management,
despite not being a consensus-critical data structure. This PR undoes
that.
---------
Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
In few tests the returned error from `SendTransaction` is not being
checked. This PR checks the returned err in tests.
Returning errors also revealed tx in `TestCommitReturnValue` is not
actually being sent, and returns err ` only replay-protected (EIP-155)
transactions allowed over RPC`. Fixed the transaction by using the
`testTx` function.
`WriteToUDP` was never called, since `meteredUdpConn` exposed directly
all the methods from the underlying `UDPConn` interface.
This fixes the `discover/egress` metric never being updated.
