The struct is 80 bytes (10 ints) — value semantics matches the type's
"snapshot, safe to pass by value" thesis stated in its doc comment, and
removes three unnecessary &-takings at call sites. No behavior change.
To check whether a transaction can be applied, we validate that
`blockGasLimit > txGasLimit + (cumulativeRegularGasUsed +
cumulativeStateGasUsed)`. However, the check should only be applied to
the bottleneck resource, i.e. `blockGasLimit >
max(txRegularGasUsed+cumulativeRegularGasUsed, txStateGasUsed+
cumulativeStateGasUsed)`.
The changes here break multiple tests. I am trying to determine why.
---------
Co-authored-by: qu0b <stefan@starflinger.eu>
